EVANSTON, IL — The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has named Illinois among seven jurisdictions it claims are “shamefully obstructing” federal immigration law. The announcement, made on Friday, May 30, 2025, is the latest flashpoint in the ongoing tension between federal immigration authorities and so-called “sanctuary” states and cities.
According to DHS, Illinois — along with Chicago, Evanston, Berwyn, Oak Park, Skokie, St. Joseph, and Urbana — is failing to cooperate with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) efforts. The agency alleges that these jurisdictions are creating environments that shield violent criminals from deportation.
Trump Administration Tightens Pressure on Sanctuary Cities
The DHS statement follows an executive order signed in April 2025 by President Donald Trump, which instructed federal agencies to identify and notify local governments that are out of compliance with federal immigration laws.
U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem commented in the release:
“These sanctuary city politicians are endangering Americans and our law enforcement in order to protect violent criminal illegal aliens.”
The Department of Justice has also filed lawsuits against Illinois, Cook County, and the City of Chicago, accusing them of obstructing federal immigration efforts through local policies that limit cooperation with ICE.
Gov. Pritzker: “You Come for My People — You Come Through Me”
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker issued a strong rebuttal, stating that the state will not back down from its commitment to being a safe and welcoming place for immigrants.
“You come for my people — you come through me,” said Pritzker, during a press conference following the DHS announcement.
He called the federal actions politically motivated and reaffirmed that Illinois will continue to protect the rights and dignity of all residents, regardless of immigration status.
Policy Clash and Future Implications
The designation of Illinois as a non-cooperative jurisdiction could impact federal funding for state and local agencies. However, legal experts say the constitutionality of such punitive actions remains contested.
Civil rights organizations have also weighed in, warning that increased federal pressure may lead to community distrust, making immigrants less likely to report crimes or cooperate with local police.
The debate underscores the deep divide between state and federal views on immigration enforcement, with Illinois maintaining its stance as a sanctuary for vulnerable populations.
Do you support Illinois’ sanctuary policies, or should the state align more closely with federal enforcement efforts? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Sources:
- DHS Sanctuary Jurisdictions List
- Patch Report on Trump DOJ Lawsuit
- Executive Order on Enforcement (WhiteHouse.gov)
- Pritzker’s Press Response
