The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has initiated a federal civil rights investigation into the administration of Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, citing concerns that recent hiring decisions were allegedly made “solely on the basis of race.”
The probe, launched by Attorney General Pam Bondi and confirmed by DOJ civil rights leadership on May 23, comes after Mayor Johnson openly highlighted Black representation within his cabinet during a May 18 speech at the Apostolic Church of God in Woodlawn.
“The deputy mayor is a Black woman. The [head of] Planning and Development is a Black woman. [My] chief operations officer is a Black man,” Johnson said at the event. “Everyone means you have to look out for the interest of Black folks, because that hasn’t happened.”
According to DOJ Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, the investigation is “open-and-shut” and based on a claim that the mayor’s remarks indicate race-based hiring intent—an alleged violation of federal employment and anti-discrimination law.
Background on the Case
Mayor Johnson’s remarks were meant to celebrate the rise of Black leadership within his administration—a contrast to decades of underrepresentation. However, federal investigators argue that explicitly using race as a hiring criterion may violate civil rights protections, even with corrective intentions.
Dhillon, a well-known conservative legal activist, told Newsmax that Chicago’s political history is “riddled with favoritism and racial discrimination,” suggesting the city is now at risk of reversing one form of exclusion with another.
Local and Political Reactions
City officials have not issued a formal statement in response to the DOJ’s investigation. However, supporters of Johnson argue the administration is working to rebalance decades of institutional inequity in local government.
Civil rights and legal scholars remain divided. Some suggest this probe is politically motivated due to the timing and framing of the DOJ’s involvement, especially under Bondi’s leadership. Others caution that federal oversight may escalate if the city resists cooperation or fails to clarify hiring protocols.
What Happens Next?
If violations are confirmed, the city could face:
-
Federal penalties
-
Oversight agreements
-
Court-ordered changes to HR and recruitment practices
No timeline has been given for the investigation’s conclusion. The probe has not halted current appointments or operations at City Hall.
What do you think—are Mayor Johnson’s hiring practices a sign of overdue progress or a potential violation of equal opportunity law? How should cities approach representation while staying within federal guidelines? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Stay tuned to ChicagoSuburbanFamily.com for updates on city policy, investigations, and the impact of federal decisions on local governance.
