ILLINOIS — Former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan has been sentenced to 7 ½ years in federal prison and fined $2.5 million, capping a decades-long political career that ended in a high-profile corruption scandal.
A federal jury found Madigan, 83, guilty earlier this year on multiple counts including bribery, conspiracy, and wire fraud in connection with a scheme involving utility giant ComEd and other political favors. His sentencing was delivered Friday by U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey, who described the case as “a tale of two Mikes” — one a long-serving public servant, the other a powerful figure who used his office for personal gain.
Judge Slams Madigan’s Conduct
Judge Blakey did not hold back in his condemnation. He said Madigan “chose to commit these crimes” despite his years of public service and called his testimony at trial “a nauseating display of perjury.”
“You lied, sir. You did not have to,” the judge told Madigan directly during sentencing.
Prosecutors had sought a 12 ½-year sentence, pointing to what they called a deeply entrenched pattern of corruption that benefited Madigan’s allies and law firm. The judge ultimately imposed a lighter sentence but emphasized the betrayal of public trust.
Testimony Backfired During Trial
Madigan’s decision to take the stand in his own defense was seen as a significant misstep. Prosecutors argued — and the judge agreed — that Madigan lied to jurors in an attempt to obstruct justice. Assistant U.S. Attorney Sarah Streicker said the former speaker “was trying to mislead the jury to get himself out of trouble.”
A key witness in the case was former Alderman Danny Solis, who secretly recorded conversations with Madigan after reaching a deal with federal authorities to avoid prosecution himself. Solis helped link Madigan to no-show ComEd jobs and political trades, including securing board positions in exchange for favorable legislation.
Madigan Pleads for Leniency
During his sentencing hearing, Madigan remained mostly expressionless, only speaking when he asked the judge for mercy, citing his family and wife Shirley’s medical issues. Shirley Madigan, suffering from long-term effects of COVID-19 and heart conditions, also submitted a video plea ahead of sentencing, saying she depended on him for care.
“When I look back on my life, being Speaker is not what gives me the most pride,” Madigan said. “I am most proud of being a good husband, father, and grandfather.”
Despite his request for probation and community service, the court sided with prosecutors, who insisted that a prison term was necessary to reflect the severity of the crimes and the need for accountability.
Long Reign Ends in Scandal
Madigan was once considered the most powerful Democrat in Illinois politics, serving as House Speaker for nearly 40 years. He was indicted on 10 felony counts in a four-month trial, convicted on charges including bribery, fraud, and conspiracy, while being acquitted or facing hung juries on 13 other charges — including the most serious allegation of racketeering.
The charges stemmed from his efforts to use political influence to benefit his private law firm and political allies. One key part of the case centered around his support of ComEd-backed legislation, in exchange for contracts, jobs, and political favors.
Community and Legal Reactions
CBS News legal analyst Irv Miller noted that early in the hearing, it seemed Madigan might get a reduced sentence, but “99% of rulings” ultimately went against him.
“It sounded like the judge actually had some contempt for him as to what he did as a public official,” Miller said.
Defense attorney Dan Collins argued Madigan never acted out of greed, but Judge Blakey concluded the opposite, highlighting the damage done to public confidence in state government.
What Comes Next
Madigan, now in his 80s, will be required to serve at least 85% of his sentence, meaning he will be nearly 90 years old before becoming eligible for release. He will also be placed on three years of supervised release following incarceration.
Despite his fall from grace, Madigan remains a controversial figure. Some supporters say he advanced significant legislation during his time in office, but the court made clear that good deeds do not excuse corruption.
What do you think about the sentencing of one of Illinois’ most powerful political figures? Was justice served? Let us know your thoughts at ChicagoSuburbanFamily.com.
